Search for: "Fluor International, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 6:13 am by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release:Fluor Hanford Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fluor Federal Services Inc. and Fluor Corporation, has agreed to pay the United States $4 million to resolve allegations that it knowingly submitted false claims and paid and received kickbacks relating to a contract to operate and manage mixed radioactive waste at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Nuclear Site in Hanford, Wash. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:13 am by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release: Fluor Hanford Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fluor Federal Services Inc. and Fluor Corporation, has agreed to pay the United States $4 million to resolve allegations that it knowingly submitted false claims and paid and received kickbacks relating to a contract to operate and manage mixed radioactive waste at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Nuclear Site in Hanford, Wash. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 11:12 pm
The Navy recently awarded three cost-plus-award-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contracts to Fluor International, Inc., URS-IAP, LLC (a joint venture of URS Corporation and IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.) and Atlantic Contingency Constructors, LLC (a limited liability company managed by The Shaw Group)... [read post]
In a per curiam, unpublished decision in In re Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., issued on March 25, 2020, the Fourth Circuit has provided some valuable guidance concerning how companies may avoid waivers of the attorney-client privilege when making disclosures to the government after privileged internal investigations. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Victoria Jeffords sued defendant BP Products North America, the operator of an oil refinery, Fluor Constructors International, the engineering and construction manager and MC Industrial. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 7:33 am
Norges Bank has made public its decision to exclude the following company: Atal SAPlease find the Council on Ethics’ recommendations here:AECOM http://etikkradet.no/en/aecom-2/ BAE Systems Plc. http://etikkradet.no/en/bae-systems-plc-2/ Fluor Corp, Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., Honeywell International Inc, http://etikkradet.no/en/fluor-corp-huntington-ingalls-industries-inc-honeywell-international-inc-2/ Evergreen… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:21 pm
Two rival companies, DynCorp International Inc and Fluor Corp submitted bids. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:23 pm by Matthew Moriarty
Six companies responded to the request: DynCorp International, LLC, AECOM Management Services, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the week are: Honeywell International Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:33 am
But when the workers get their first paycheck, they see that it's not coming from KBR, but from a KBR subsidiary, Service Employers International Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:58 am by Guest Blogger
  In the past, the DHBA has recognized Siemens PLM (2011), Fluor Law Department (2010), AT&T Services, Inc. (2009), American Airlines, Inc. (2008), Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (2007), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2006). [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:28 pm
—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, pet. denied)). 48 814 F.3d 701, 717 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing Fluor Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 9:14 pm
Their complaint also names four premise owners, Dupont, Chevron, Texaco, and Exxon Mobile, as well as the following contractors that he claims provided the material that contained asbestos, Bechtel, Able Supply, Daniel International, HP Zachary, and Fluor, as defendants. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Marcionese issued his decision Sept. 29, 2008. *** Fluor Daniel, Inc. (15-CA-12544, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 79) Baton Rouge, LA Jan. 27, 2009. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:43 pm by Louthian Law Firm
Earlier environmental qui tam cases include a whistleblower win of $4.1 million against Westinghouse Hanford Co. and Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., alleging contractors overcharged the DOE for cleanup at Hanford Nuclear Reservation in a $240 million case; and a $4.2 million case involving misrepresenting the progress of nuclear cleanup at Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant by Rockwell International. [read post]